Legal Opinion

McFarland v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1982No. 05-81-00623-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AKIN, Justice.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for forgery and from the revocation of his probation. Defendant received a three year probated sentence for forgery, which was revoked on April 23,1981. Because we hold that the probation revocation hearing violated Tex.Code Crim.Pro.Ann. art. 42.12 § 8(a) (Vernon Supp.1982) and denied de*18fendant due process of law, we reverse the order revoking defendant’s probation.

On March 27, 1981, the trial court first considered the State’s motion to revoke defendant’s probation. Defendant entered a plea of true to the charge that he failed to report…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Craven v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Trifovesti v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Freddie Jerome Hargrave v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  3. Johnny D. Blaylock A/K/A Johnny D. Baylock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  4. Johnny D. Blaylock A/K/A Johnny D. Baylock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  5. Juan Ballesteros v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API