Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1966No. Appeal, 197PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

On February 13, 1965, the appellant, George Schmidt, while represented by court-appointed counsel, was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree and punishment was fixed at life imprisonment. Post trial motions were overruled and sentence imposed as the jury directed. Schmidt filed this appeal.

Two assignments of error are asserted: (1) Incriminating statements given by Schmidt to the police were obtained in violation of his constitutional rights and, therefore, evidence thereof was erroneously admitted at trial; (2) The trial court erred in its charge to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. EckhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API