Piersall v. Huber Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Carroll
Affirming.
In 1906 the appellant, who will hereafter be styled the plaintiff, brought a suit in equity against the appellee, hereafter called the defendant, stating her cause of action in two paragraphs.
In the first paragraph it was averred that in July, 1906, the defendant sold and delivered to the plaintiff an 18 horse-power traction engine, and warranted the same to be well-constructed and with proper use and management to be capable of doing well the work for *339which the same was sold, namely, to furnish the power necessary to run and operate a thresher…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fowler v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Connihan v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Bowen v. . MandevilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Roberts v. MossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carroll Gas & Oil Co. v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- White v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Meade v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949