Legal Opinion

Lawler Mobile Homes v. Hinkle

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 15, 1984No. Civ. 4202PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

The employee sought workmen's compensation benefits from her employer. The trial court found the employee to be "totally and permanently disabled" and awarded her benefits. In addition, the trial court awarded lump sum attorney fees and allowed the employer a credit for earlier sums recovered by the employee in a prior tort action.

The employer through able counsel, who has favored this court with an excellent brief, appeals and we affirm.

The employer raises two issues. The employer first contends that the trial court erred in awarding lump sum attorney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Ashland Chemical Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. Tidwell Industries, Inc. v. KennedyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Genpak Corp. v. GibsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. Ex Parte St. Regis Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Lowe v. WaltersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Topline Retreads of Decatur, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API