Legal Opinion
State v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 5, 1997No. 88774PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
695 So.2d 686 (1997)
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Burt MARSHALL, Respondent.
No. 88774.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 5, 1997.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Fleur J. Lobree and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorneys General, Miami, for Petitioner.
Laurie D. Hall, Tavernier, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We review State v. Marshall, 695 So.2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), in which the court certified direct conflict with State v. Riley, 617 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, sections 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.
In construing section 316.066, Florida…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. NorstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. MarshallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- State v. RileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
4Cited by10 opinions
- Ward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- State v. WhelanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Smallridge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Vedner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Alexander v. Penske Logistics, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.