Legal Opinion
Shank v. Associated Transport, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1950No. Civ. No. 3592PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., directed interrogatories to the Associated Transport, Inc., one of the defendants, to which the Associated Transport, Inc., filed objections.
Objections to interrogatories 1(a) and 1 (b) have been withdrawn.
Interrogatories 1(c) and 1(d) have reference to an allegation in- the answer that plaintiff was operating his motorcycle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Plaintiff is entitled to an answer to that portion thereof requesting names and addresses of persons from whom such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Glick v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
- Klein v. Leader Electric CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1948
- Chenault v. Nebraska Farm Products, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
- Love v. Metropolitan Life Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baker v. Yellow Cab Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
- Fishermen & Merchants Bank v. BurinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951