Legal Opinion

Kuykendall v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1996No. 24796PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Ronald Dale Kuykendall entered a plea of guilty to one count of manufacturing a controlled substance, NRS 453.321. Pursuant to former NRS 174.065(3), appellant was entitled to withdraw his plea if the district court sentenced appellant to more than the recommended maximum of ten years under the plea agreement. At the sentencing hearing on December 2, 1992, the district court stated that it disagreed with the handling of the case and with the recommended sentence. The district court stated that it was bound by the plea agreement, but would specifically refuse to grant credit…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Robert C. Beauchamp v. Paul Murphy, the Superintendent of the Old Colony Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. People v. RioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. GrantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gaines v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Haney v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Alquandre Turner v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Johnson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API