Legal Opinion

State v. Cowles

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 26, 2008No. 06-1461PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HECHT, Justice.

We are asked, on further review of a decision of the court of appeals, to decide whether the district court erred in concluding it imposed an illegal mandatory minimum sentence. We conclude the sentence was not illegal under the circumstances presented here, and the district court therefore erred in correcting it. Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the court of appeals affirming the “correction” of the sentence, reverse the district court’s ruling, and remand for entry of a judgment reinstating the mandatory minimum sentence.

I. Factual and Procedural Background.

On March 14,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. SeeringSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. State v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  4. State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LathropSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. State v. EfflerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. State v. SimnickNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. John Edward Cowles, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
  5. State Of Iowa Vs. James Carson EfflerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API