Legal Opinion

Clemmons v. Nicholson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 8, 1938No. 14718Published

1Opinion

On Petition eor Rehearing

2Per curiam

The petition for a rehearing has been carefully considered and cannot be granted. No points have been overlooked or misapprehended by the Court. On the contrary the points set forth in the petition have all been considered and expressly decided against the respondent by this Court in the opinion filed.

Ordered that the petition for a rehearing be and hereby is refused.

The reasons for refusing the petition are:

Respondent now relies on the case of Cromer v. Watson, 59 S. C., 488, 38 S. E., 126. In respondent’s original printed argument it is said by respondent that :

“The…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cromer v. WatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API