Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Chitty

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 3, 1999No. 99-295PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGoshorn, J.

The circuit court entered a temporary injunction barring Appellants Murphy .and Person from violating their non-compete agreements with appellees Robert Chitty and Chitty & Company (collectively “Chitty”). Appellants argue that the court *698erred in determining that the non-compete agreements were independent of certain other agreements between the parties which Chitty allegedly breached prior to Appellants’ admitted violation of the non-compete agreements. We agree and reverse.

Appellants are accountants and investment advisors. Prior to November 21, 1997, they were owners of and officers in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cordis Corp. v. ProoslinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Steak House v. BarnettSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Bradley v. Health Coalition, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Standard Newspapers, Inc. v. WoodsSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  5. Sarasota Beverage Co. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richland Towers, Inc. v. DentonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API