Legal Opinion
Chiu Chung Chan v. Su Ru Chen
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 6, 2007No. 06-P-1074PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGelinas, J.
The defendant, Su Ru Chen (seller), appeals, arguing that the trial judge erred in allowing in evidence out-of-court statements made by two witnesses, Bob Sun (Sun) and Frances Sun (Frances), to the plaintiff, Chiu Chung Chan (buyer), as “vicarious admissions” of the seller; that the judge incorrectly denied the seller’s posttrial motion to vacate due to fraud; and that the judge committed error in denying the seller’s posttrial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for new trial.
In October, 2001, the seller owned and operated the Lucky Duck Fortune Cookie…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Canavan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,441 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Geon Industries, Inc., Frank Bloom and Edwards & HanlyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Shafter W. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Equipment & Systems for Industry, Inc. v. Northmeadows Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ryan v. Hughes-OrtizMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Wasson v. WassonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Smaland Beach Association, Inc. v. GenovaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- By v. Massachusetts Registry of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
- CRG Financial, LLC v. Two Diamond Capital CorpDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.