Legal Opinion
Lichtenstein v. Bauer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 12, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, Kings County (Jules Spodek, J.), entered on or about February 15, 1991, in favor of defendant William Bauer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A jury verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside unless the jury could not have reached the verdict upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Patti v Fenimore, 181 AD2d 869, 871; Niewieroski v National Cleaning Contrs., 126 AD2d 424, lv denied 70 NY2d 602). Here, there was a conflict in expert testimony between plaintiff’s expert, who testified that plaintiff’s pain was the result of a herniated disc…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Niewieroski v. National Cleaning ContractorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Patti v. FenimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Syrkett v. BurdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Silvestri v. SmallbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Heller v. 83rd Street Investors L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cioffi v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Jackson v. Mungo One, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Heraud v. WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.