Mosley v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
We are satisfied-that the evidence against the accused, charged with burglary, was insufficient to support the verdict of guilty, and that the trial judge erred in not granting the motion for a new trial upon the general grounds. The defendant was indicted for burglary, in that he did break and enter the house of G. L. Sikes, with intent to .commit a larceny therein. In a prosecution for burglary it is essential that there be proof of a breaking, then an entering, and that the house broken was one of the character upon which burglary may be committed. Without sufficient proof of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grimes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Colbert v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Lanier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Lockhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Kent v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mullinnix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Gentry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Moseley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- United States v. Kedric EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.