Legal Opinion

Mosley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1934No. 23863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

We are satisfied-that the evidence against the accused, charged with burglary, was insufficient to support the verdict of guilty, and that the trial judge erred in not granting the motion for a new trial upon the general grounds. The defendant was indicted for burglary, in that he did break and enter the house of G. L. Sikes, with intent to .commit a larceny therein. In a prosecution for burglary it is essential that there be proof of a breaking, then an entering, and that the house broken was one of the character upon which burglary may be committed. Without sufficient proof of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grimes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. Colbert v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Lanier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Lockhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Kent v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mullinnix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Gentry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Moseley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. United States v. Kedric EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API