Legal Opinion
THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS v. Occidental Gems, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 2008PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.
We are called upon to determine whether the Appellate Division correctly affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion to confirm a special referee’s report which recommended that defendant Occidental Gems, Inc. (Occidental) be compelled to produce (1) Vijay Mehta, a resident of Belgium, for an oral deposition in New York and (2) testimony and documents relating to a Belgian arbitration in which Occidental is not a party. We…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Di Mascio v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by97 opinions
- 148 Magnolia, LLC v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Global Strat Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Byam v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Harris v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Lucas v. StamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.