Legal Opinion

Kaul v. Federation of State Medical Boards

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 1, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-3050Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-cv-3050 (TSC) ) FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL ) BOARDS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Richard Kaul and Arnold Feldman, proceeding pro se, have sued over thirty companies, medical boards, and individuals, alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), the Clayton Act, the Sherman Act, and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Various defendants have filed five motions to…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API