Myrick v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1DissentMcMILLAN, Judge
The majority opinion has ignored the doctrine of harmless error in finding that the trial court abused its discretion in limiting the defense counsel’s cross-examination of Hanceville undercover police officer Charles Ivey. The trial court did not allow the defense counsel to impeach the testimo*1219ny of State’s witness Officer Ivey regarding his testimony that he remained in Hanceville after the alleged second marijuana sale was consummated. The defense counsel, through her impeachment cross-examination, was attempting to show that Officer Ivey went with the appellant some time after the alleged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Wiggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Buckelew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- Coburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.