Legal Opinion

Baret v. Koppers Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 1947No. Civil Action No. 5486PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, District Judge.

This is an action by Marcel A. Baret et al., in which seventy-five (75) separate plaintiffs have joined, against Koppers Company, Inc., for over-time compensation, liquidated damages, etc., under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 216(b), 201 et seq.

The relevant parts of the bill of complaint which contains the allegation of fact upon which the plaintiffs base their right of recovery are more particularly Paragraphs 4, 5 and 7, and which are as follows:

“IV. Defendant is engaged in the manufacture and production of goods and products made of raw…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. Musteen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  5. Hummel v. Wells Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gas Consumers Ass'n v. Philadelphia Gas Works Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. First Trust & Sav. Bank v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Morton v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  4. Reese v. AltermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API