United States v. Jorge Oliva
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2522, governs interception of wire, oral and electronic communications. Jorge Ortiz Oliva appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a series of electronic surveillance orders authorizing interception of communications over cellular phones associated with him and his alleged co-conspirators. 1 Oliva contends these orders by their terms authorized more than “standard” intercepts, permitting more intrusive “roving” intercepts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. OlivaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jorge OlivaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012