Legal Opinion

United States v. Jorge Oliva

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 20, 2012No. 10-30126, 10-30134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2522, governs interception of wire, oral and electronic communications. Jorge Ortiz Oliva appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a series of electronic surveillance orders authorizing interception of communications over cellular phones associated with him and his alleged co-conspirators. 1 Oliva contends these orders by their terms authorized more than “standard” intercepts, permitting more intrusive “roving” intercepts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. OlivaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Jorge OlivaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API