Legal Opinion
Kimmelman v. Morrison
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 26, 1986No. 84-1661PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
477 U.S. 365 (1986)
KIMMELMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL.
v.
MORRISON
No. 84-1661.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 5, 1986
Decided June 26, 1986
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Allan J. Nodes argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Catherine A. Foddai, Mildred Vallerini Spiller, and Arlene R. Weiss, Deputy Attorneys General.
William E. Staehle, by appointment of the Court 474 U. S. 917, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · BrennanJustice Brennan
The question we address…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
3Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Sarah Weeden v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- (HC) Torres v. DucartDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019