Reynolds v. Plumbers' Material Protective Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Motion for a nonsuit..
1Opinion of the CourtDavy, J.
I am inclined to think that the motion for a nonsuit must be granted, for the reason that the alleg’ed libelous article is privileged.
The plaintiff, in the year 1896,- purchased a quantity of plumbing materials of one of the members of the defendant corporation. A controversy arose between these parties as to the amount plaintiff was owing for the goods purchased. The by-laws of the association provide that if the debtor does not settle the claim with the member, or present to the corporation some reason for not doing so, or submit the controversy to arbitration, the corporation then, through…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hemmens v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Bacon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Byam v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Lewis and Herrick v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCarter v. Baltimore Chamber of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Roseneau v. Empire Circuit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- People v. LovelessNew York Court of Special Session · 1903
- J. Hartman Co. v. Hyman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1925
- Trapp v. Du BoisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.