Legal Opinion

In Re Laberge Moto-Cross Track

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 6, 2011No. 09-426PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. The Laberges, landowners, appeal from an Environmental Court decision requiring them to obtain a zoning permit and conditional use approval for a private recreational motocross track they built on their residential property in rural Hinesburg. The Environmental Court reasoned that the network of earthen berms, connected by a single-lane dirt track, constituted a structure for purposes of the local zoning ordinance and thus qualified as the type of land development that would require a permit. Because we do not find the track to be a structure of the type contemplated by the zoning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of 232511 Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. In Re Champlain College Maple Street DormitorySupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Town of Salem v. DurrettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. In Re Appeal of LashinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  5. Tanis v. Township of HamptonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. In re Confluence Behavioral Health, LLC Conditional Use to Operate a Therapeutic Community Residence Program (Jason Albert, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. In re All Metals Recycling, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. In re Snyder Group, Inc. PUD Final PlatSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  5. In re Champlain Oil Company Conditional Use ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API