Legal Opinion

Novelty Theater Co. v. Whitcomb

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1909No. 5691PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from'Pueblo District Court — Hon. N. Walter Dixon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The action is to recover damages for personal injuries sustained under these circumstances and conditions: ' The plaintiff below, appellee here, Lottie Whitcomb, with her husband, were employed to perform as actors by The Novelty Theater Company, appellant here, defendant below, in the city of Pueblo at the Empire theater, for the week ending April 3, 1904. The act which the plaintiff and her husband presented consisted in the imitation by them of the action and noises of certain barnyard fowls, as the rooster and hen, interspersed with singing and dancing. A portion of the fifth paragraph of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lord v. Pueblo Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  2. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co. v. AmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. Deep Mining & Drainage Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. Iowa Gold Mining Co. v. DiefenthalerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  5. Poorman Silver Mines of Colorado, Ltd. v. DevlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beeson v. Kelran Constructors, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API