Legal Opinion

Barad v. Leppert Roos Fur Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1969No. 33148PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Judge.

Plaintiff sued defendant, a furrier with whom she had stored a fur coat, for negligence. Jury verdict and judgment for plaintiff was for the sum of $4,500.00, the agreed fair market value of the coat.

The petition alleged plaintiff stored her coat with defendant and demanded its return “but because of the negligence and carelessness of defendants in the storage and keeping of fur coats, said fur coat has not been returned. * * * Defendants have superior knowledge or means of information as to the exact cause of why said fur coat has not been returned.” The answer alleged the coat…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harry and Florence Kelley v. Natl. Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. England v. Lyon Fireproof Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Hutchinson v. United States Express Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Gutknecht v. Wagner Bros. Moving & Storage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Hodell v. Tower's Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Handshy v. HastyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Royster v. PittmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API