Horton v. Misso

The entire farm here in question had been for several years occupied by appellee as the tenant of the owner, when on August 5, 1924, the owner conveyed to appellee, by a deed duly executed, a small strip of land out of the west side of said farm. Appellee failed to put his deed of record, but continued to use and occupy all the land, the entire farm, including" the strip conveyed to him, as he had theretofore done. That is to say, there was no visible change in the character of his occupancy so as tó show that his possession and occupancy of the land, subsequent to his said deed, was as owner…