Legal Opinion

Grabler Manufacturing Co. v. Kosydar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1973No. 73-38PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

Two questions are presented in this case: (1) Are the monies paid by Grabler as deficiencies pursuant to the lease agreement excepted from sales and use taxes? (2) What was the effective date of the repeal of the use-on-use exception?

Grabler paid to Commercial $8,314,711 in deficiency payments for two sales of equipment pursuant to their lease agreement. Appellant contends that these monies were paid as liquidated damages for breach of the lease contract and as such are not subject to Ohio sales or use tax.

The lease contained two alternate provisions for premature termination, Section 4 and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. South Main Akron, Inc. v. Lynn Realty, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Citicorp International Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Osborne Bros. Welding Supply, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Columbus Equipment Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wise v. Summit County Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API