Rogers v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
BEALES, Judge.
A jury convicted Stephan Rogers (appellant) of attempted robbery and use or attempted use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. He appeals these convictions, arguing that the evidence was not sufficient to convict him of the two crimes because the victim was “not present” and because “no circumstances independent of the will of the appellant ... interrupted him and his companions.” We, however, find the evidence was sufficient to convict him of both crimes.
BACKGROUND
G.V. * lived with his wife and family in an apartment on the first floor of a budding in Arlington,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
- Hicks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
- People v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Bloom v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Granberry v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Antonio SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Martin HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Freddy Velez-Suarez v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
- Dustin Scott Jones v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- State v. AlersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.