Philman's, Inc. v. City of West Carrollton
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF; FURTHER PROCEDURES SET TO DETERMINE SCOPE OF RELIEF
RICE, District Judge.
This lawsuit challenges the legality, under the federal constitution, of an ordinance passed by the city of West Carroll-ton, Ohio, which regulates the sale of drug paraphernalia to minors. Based upon the uncontested facts as submitted by the parties, the following discussion will constitute the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989