Succession of Anderson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs, Mrs. Doris Anderson Maggio and Mrs. Rae Anderson Vallery,1 are appealing from a judgment dismissing their alternative demand2 against their brother, Robert Lee Anderson, for collation alleged*197ly due because of advantages which their father, George Anderson,3 bestowed upon the defendant in two certain sales of real estate in the Parish of East Feliciana at a very low price — one, by deed of February 2, 1940, where he conveyed 20 acres of land of the value of $1,000 for $100, and the other, by deed of March 3, 1949, where he conveyed 565 acres of land, of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Montgomery v. ChaneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
- Gonsoulin v. GonsoulinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Succession of LamotteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Steen v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Schwegmann v. SchwegmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Succession of RollingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Succession of Boyd v. AdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973