Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burlington Northern Railroad v. Board of Supervisors of Adair County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 20, 1988No. 86-1329Published

1DissentCarter, Justice

I dissent.

It is manifestly inappropriate to try the issues of the present controversy in a mandamus action. I submit that the majority’s failure to recognize this stems, at least in part, from a mistaken belief that we are dealing with liquidated amounts for which the various boards of supervisors could have ordered warrants. This was clearly not the case.

The United States district court which granted plaintiff relief made it clear that this was only prospective declaratory and injunctive relief. See Burlington N.R.R. v. Bair, 584 F.Supp. 1229, 1242 (S.D.Iowa 1984). The limitations which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Commercial National Bank v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Burlington Northern Railroad v. BairDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1984
  4. Crown Concrete Company v. ConklingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Birusingh v. KnoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API