Legal Opinion

Burns v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1977No. 10008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*531OPINION

2Per curiam

Indicted for murder (NRS 200.010), and attempted murder (NRS 200.010; NRS 208.070), William Burns petitioned for habeas corpus and now appeals from the order denying the requested relief.

Burns raised several contentions below, and reasserted them here.

1. First, Burns argues he is constitutionally entitled to a preliminary examination; thus, the grand jury proceeding violated his rights of equal protection and due process. The same argument has previously been considered and consistently rejected by this court. See Cairns v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 113, 508 P.2d 1015 (1973), and its progeny.

2.…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. Sheriff, Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cairns v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McDonald v. Sheriff of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Graves v. YoungNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Howard v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Biondi v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Burns v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Burns v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API