Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Dillahunty

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 9, 1987No. 87-83PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is a habeas corpus case brought by a minor, through her parents as next friends, to cause the appellees, an attorney and unknown other persons, to produce her baby girl. The chancellor denied the writ on the basis that the minor appellant, Cheryl Bruce, had executed a lawful consent to the adoption of the child. We must reverse and remand the case, as we hold Ms. Bruce has shown a right to the custody of her child, and the record does not demonstrate that any such right to custody was shown to have been in the appellees.

The facts reviewed by the chancellor were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Department of Public Welfare v. Lipe ex rel. AtracnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Washaw v. GimbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  3. Tucker v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Feight v. FeightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Schrum ex rel. Gaither v. BoldingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of ParsonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Matter of Adoption of ParsonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API