Miser Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. Moody
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Rio Grande, County. Eon. C. (7.’ EolbrooTi, Judge. Action by Tbe Misc.’ Gold Mining and Milling Company, George W. Ballintine, Charles E. Cotton and Alexander Ross against Frank E. Moody, James B. Knoblock, Eben E. Eaton, Clarence A. Moody, Fred H. Nye and The Nebraska Rio Grande Mining Company. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
Defendants Frank E. Moody, Knoblock and Eaton were the owners of what is known as the *312Misc. group of mines, located in Rio Grande county; plaintiffs Ballintine and Cotton and defendants Nye and the two Moodys were the owners of certain unpatented mining claims in the same county; defendant The Nebraska Rio Grande'Mining Company, a corporation, owned certain unpatented mining claims in the same county, and also a bond and lease upon the Misc. group. This company had contracted an indebtedness in working the Misc. group, which it was unable to pay.
It was agreed, by the several parties, to form…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parker v. KaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
- Rogers v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Brady v. HuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Killey v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Warren v. TobeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reiff v. Nebraska-California Colony Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Coopers & Lybrand v. FoxColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Seifert v. GildersleeveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928