Legal Opinion

Meador-Pasley Co. v. Hallmark

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1935No. 7 Div. 88Published

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

This was an action based upon four promissory notes, set out and described in the complaint. The only plea filed was the general issue. Plaintiff made out its case, and the defendant did not deny the claim or the correctness of the amount sued for, but testified that the itemized claim as introduced in evidence by plaintiff had never been filed with her as executrix of the estate of her husband who contracted the debt and executed the notes sued on. The court charged the jury that, if the claim had never been filed with defendant, plaintiff could not recover. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fretwell v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Peters v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Shafer v. MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Dillworth v. Holmes Furn. & Vehicle Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Smith v. HuieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API