Legal Opinion

Browning v. Sire

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Applications for the appointment of a receiver in three actions brought to foreclose three separate second mortgages upon three distinct parcels of property situated in the borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

These are applications for the appointment of a receiver in three actions brought to foreclose three separate second mortgages upon three distinct parcels of property situated *504in the borough of Manhattan, New York city. The applications are submitted together, as practically the same questions are involved in each application. An answer is interposed in each action by the owner of the equity, in which it is claimed that the mortgage sought to be foreclosed is usurious. The moving affidavits show that a considerable sum is due for interest, unpaid taxes and Groton water rates. Each of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. KruppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. C. B. Keogh Manufacturing Co. v. WhistonNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Building Loan Banking Co. v. BeglyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API