Legal Opinion

People v. Kane

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 10, 2010No. 2—08—0875, 2—09—0759 consPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Defendant, Timothy D. Kane, entered an open guilty plea to escape (720 ILCS 5/31 — 6(c) (West 2004)). He was sentenced as a Class X offender (see 730 ILCS 5/5 — 5—3(c)(8) (West 2004)) to 20 years in prison. The trial court denied his motion to reconsider his sentence. On appeal, we remanded the cause for compliance with Supreme Court Rule 604(d) (210 Ill. 2d R. 604(d)) (People v. Kane, No. 2 — 07—1274 (2008) (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23)). On remand, defendant’s motion to reconsider his sentence was denied, and he appealed (appeal No. 2 — 08—0875).

Defendant then petitioned…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. VincentIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sarkissian v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Klein v. La Salle National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Krueger v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. KaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  2. People v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API