Ramos v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AMY, Judge.
LThe plaintiff was seriously injured after falling from a rope swing into a creek *1068allegedly located on a right-of-way of the State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development. After other defendants were dismissed, DOTD filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that it was entitled to recreational use immunity under La.R.S. 9:2791 and La. R.S. 9:2795 and that the plaintiff could not establish DOTD’s liability for his injuries. The trial court granted DOTD’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff appeals. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
Factual…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Socorro v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Dupree v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Netecke v. State Ex Rel. DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ramos v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Jerry Ramos v. State of La, Thru the DotdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Ramos v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013