Legal Opinion

Hamide v. State, Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 1991No. 91-105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The issues presented in this appeal are whether the notice provisions in section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes, may be substantially complied with and whether there is in fact substantial compliance where the agency receives notice of claim by some means other than directly from the claimant. For the following reasons, we affirm the summary judgment entered against appellant, thereby dismissing his claim for personal injury against the Department of Corrections (DOC).

*137Appellant was injured while a passenger in a van driven by a DOC employee on July 20, 1984. He sent notice…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levine v. Dade County School Bd.Supreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Menendez v. North Broward Hosp. Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Hamide v. STATE, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Franklin v. Department of HealthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maynard v. State, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. CRAIG SIMMONS v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API