Legal Opinion

City of New Haven v. Reichhart

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2000No. 90A02-9904-CV-247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The City of New Haven (“the City”) appeals from the dismissal of its malicious prosecution claim against Penny Reichhart (“Reichhart”) and Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, L.L.C. (“CWMI”). The City presents several issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the City failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Indiana Trial Rule 12(B)(6).

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This court has previously stated the facts of this case in Reichhart v. City of New Haven, 1 674 N.E.2d 27 (Ind.Ct.App.1996), tra ns.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of New Haven v. ReichhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of Gary Ex Rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. City of Gary Ex Rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API