Legal Opinion

State v. Mendell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2010No. 23918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Scott A. Mendell, appeals from his conviction and sentence for having weapons under a disability, in violation of R.C. 2923.13(A)(2), following a no-eontest plea. Mendell contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence. He argues that the police did not have a valid arrest warrant at the time they entered his residence, because they did not have the warrant at the time of the arrest and because there was no probable cause for the issuance of the warrant. He also argues that the officers placed him under arrest and then…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GardOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. MendellOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. GoldenOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API