Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Prato & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph F. Gagliardi, J.

The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation moves to stay arbitration on the basis of a notice of claim, a purported photocopy of a police report and on an unattached copy of respondent’s statement. The illegibility of the police report and the failure to attach the statement would warrant denial of the relief requested.

Nevertheless, the court will assume that the papers establish certain facts urged by MVAIC. They are that the vehicle was unregistered, uninsured and driven backwards into claimant while he was working in his automobile body shop on private property.

MVAIC contends…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Hall & Royal Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Queens Transit Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API