East Tennessee & Georgia Railroad v. Evans
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from the judgment of the Circuit Court, March Term, 1871. John B. Hoyl, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
Although, the amount of damages ($137.20) allowed *608by the jury for the hogs killed, seems to be high, we can not say that it is excessive and exorbitant, as insisted in the argument. One of them seems, from the proof, to have been of peculiar value, and the price of pork and bacon was very high, according to the proof, when the accident occurred, in the fall of 1865. There is evidence in the record which fully sustains the verdict, although there is other proof which would have authorized the jury to find a smaller amount of damages. The case was properly submitted to the jury, and upon a well…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Evans v. Interstate Rapid Transit Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Kelley v. Mississippi Central R.United States Circuit Court · 1880
- Whittaker v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Finley v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
- Finley v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931