Legal Opinion
Hrouda v. Town of Hollis
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 8, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
Clemens Hrouda appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, (York County, Perkins, ./.), affirming a decision by the Planning Board of the Town of Hollis to permit an office and truck maintenance facility in a rural three acre zone. Because we agree with the defendants that the facility is a conditional use permitted under Section 5.3.4(18), (20), and (21) of the Hollis Zoning Ordinance, and we agree that the Board properly considered all aspects of the project, we affirm the judgment.
Heatley’s Line Construction of Maine, an electric power line construction, maintenance and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Maine Clean Fuels, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- George D. Ballard, Builder, Inc. v. City of WestbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gorham v. Town of Cape ElizabethSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Town of OgunquitDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2001
- Palesky v. Town of TopshamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Town of LincolnvilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Gorham v. Town of Cape ElizabethSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.