Ohl v. Coleman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District. Action by Adam Ohl against Nathan Coleman and another, copartners under the name of Coleman & Krause. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants" appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The defendants ordered a machine of the plain-_ tiff’s assignors by a letter of which the following is a copy:
“Oct. 8th, 1907.
“George A. Ohl & Co., 161 Oraton St., Newark, N. J.—Gentlemen: Kindly enter our order for one 38" crimping machine, price $250.00. It is understood that the above machine is guaranteed to crimp *20 gauge iron. It is further agreed between you and ourselves in regards to the payment as follows: $75.00 on delivery and set in position complete and the balance of $25.00 each month. This crimper to be driven by belt power. Kindly hurry same along and oblige. '
“Tours very…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Cooper v. . PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Perry v. BatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Manhattan Guide Co. v. GluckAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906