Legal Opinion

Burns v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1978No. Claim No. 57064; Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1.) Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this appropriation case the trial court correctly concluded that the evidence failed to establish a reasonable probability of rezoning the subject parcel from residential to commercial use at the time of the taking (Matter of City of New York [Shore Front High School—Rudnick], 25 NY2d 146, mod 26 NY2d 748; Masten v State of New York, 11 AD2d 370, affd 9 NY2d 796; Matter of City of Rochester v Dray, 60 AD2d 766). Inasmuch as the claimant’s appraisal was based solely on a speculative commercial use providing only commercial sales…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Priestly v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Masten v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Masten v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  5. Kravec v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burns v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API