Legal Opinion

State v. Nine

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. W. F. Conrad, Judge. Indictment for obtaining property by false pretenses. Verdict of guilty, and a judgment thereon, from which the defendant appealed. —

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

1 — The indictment is against defendant, Nine, and one John Stewart, but the trial was alone as to Nine. The property charged to have been obtained by false pretenses was boots, shoes, and other property, of the value of eight hundred dollars, belonging to one Joseph Lawson. For such property Lawson received two notes, one for five hundred dollars and one for three hundred dollars, payable to the order of John Stewart, and signed by Walter Brinkerhoff, which notes were to be secured by a mortgage on certain described land in the state of Missouri. These facts appear in the indictment, and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Franklin v. TwogoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. Younker ex rel. Ralston v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Pearson v. CummingsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  5. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Silkworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. State v. BarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API