Legal Opinion
Stuebner v. Stuebner
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtC. A. Johnson, J.
In an action to foreclose a $3,000 mortgage dated June 10, 1929, for the nonpayment of the semiannual interest which became due and payable on December 10, 1929, and on every June 10th and December 10th thereafter, to and including December 10,1944, the defendants move, pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint upon the ground. that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations embodied in section 47-a of the Civil Practice Act (added by L. 1938, ch. 499, eff. Sept. 1,1938; amd. by L. 1941, ch. 329, eff. Sept. 1,1941)
At the time the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- People v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Gilbert v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Egan v. Carroll-Garfield Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945
- Heller v. SheftmanNew York Supreme Court · 1948