Legal Opinion

Benandi v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 2000No. 00-21PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I THIBODEAUX, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation action, the defendant, Louisiana Pacific Corporation, appeals the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation that Louisiana Pacific did not reasonably controvert its failure to approve medical treatment by a referred physician. The hearing officer assessed penalties and attorney fees in the amounts of $2,000.00 and $5,000.00, respectively.

For the following reasons, the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Office is affirmed.

I

ISSUE

We shall consider whether the hearing officer erred in assessing penalties and attorney fees…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ardoin v. Calcasieu Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Harper v. Boise Paper Holdings, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Lonnie Harper v. Boise Paper Holdings, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Stephanie Lemelle Ardoin v. Calcasieu Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API