Legal Opinion

McFarland v. McGhee

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, J. —

The plaintiff was the owner of Lot 2 in Block 48 in the town of Stuart, Iowa, at the time in controversy. The adjoining lot was owned by Wade and J. F. McGhee,' or by J. F. McGhee alone, and was occupied by the defendant R. A. McGhee, as a tenant. While Wade and J. F. McGhee are made de-. fendants in the petition, no notice was served on either of them, and they did not appear in the case. R. A. McGhee appeared and filed answer and proceeded to trial, resulting as above stated. Execution was issued, and plaintiff paid tbe costs in tbe lower court.

After this ease had been appealed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hampton v. McKeehanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van Heukelom v. Black Hawk Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Central State Bank v. LordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Manning v. HeathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Thie v. Consolidated Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API