United States v. Joseph Merlino
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VANASKIE, Circuit Judge.
At issue on this appeal is whether a District Court has jurisdiction to revoke supervised release when neither an arrest warrant nor a summons concerning an alleged violation of supervised release was *81issued before the term of supervised release expired. We hold that 18 U.S.C. § 3583® is a jurisdictional statute requiring that a warrant or summons must issue before the expiration of supervised release in order for a District Court to conduct revocation proceedings. Because the summons in this matter was issued after the termination of supervised…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Apple Macpro Computer Apple MaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. William TysonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Donte IslandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Peter PocklingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. William BlockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.