Legal Opinion

Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Logan

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 21, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

— Reversing.

This action involves the correct construction and legislative intended application of sections 4659, 4134, and a part of section 723, of the 1922 edition of Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes. The first one was enacted on February 3, 1893, and says: “If a surety in any official bond, or bond of a personal representative, guardian, curator, assignee or trustee, committee of a lunatic, master commissioner, receiver, or in any bond or covenant which by law may be required to be executed in court, or before an officer at the commencement or during the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Bogni v. PerottiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Idaho Savings & Loan Association v. RodenIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'n Board v. West Helena Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API